Global NewsHigh Priority (8/10)Usa

Supreme Court Signals Support for Trump Administration in Asylum Metering Policy Case

The US Supreme Court indicated sympathy toward the Trump administration's defense of the 2018 'metering' policy that allows border officials to turn away asylum seekers when the border is deemed overburdened.

Key Points

  • Supreme Court justices indicated sympathy for Trump administration's position
  • Case challenges 2018 'metering' policy allowing border officials to turn away asylum seekers
  • Legal issue centers on whether asylum seekers on Mexican side have 'arrived' in US
  • Ninth Circuit previously ruled metering policy violated federal law

Full Details

US Supreme Court justices showed support on Tuesday for the Trump administration's position in a case challenging the government's authority to turn away asylum seekers when officials deem US-Mexico border crossings too overburdened to handle additional claims. The 2018 'metering' policy allowed US immigration officials to stop asylum seekers at the border and decline to process their claims indefinitely. The narrow legal question is whether asylum seekers stopped on the Mexican side of the border have 'arrived' in the United States. The San Francisco-based Ninth US Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in 2024 that federal law requires border agents to inspect all asylum seekers who 'arrive' at designated border crossings, even if they have not yet crossed into the US, finding the metering policy violated that obligation.

Why It Matters

A Supreme Court ruling in favor of the administration could significantly restrict asylum processing at the US-Mexico border, potentially creating longer wait times and more dangerous conditions for migrants. This could also establish broader executive authority over immigration enforcement at ports of entry.

Sourcetheguardian.com

Get stories like this delivered daily

AI-curated news, personalized to your interests. Zero noise.

Start 7-Day Free Trial →

More in Global News